Skip to main content

Nuclear Family Affair

I recently read this book: Full Body Burden: Growing Up in the Nuclear Shadow of Rocky Flats

I couldn't stop reading, even when I was horrified and frustrated by the government coverups, the nuclear disasters, and the persistent denial that plutonium dust in the wind around the general Denver area was a problem.

Still processing, I wrote this long haiku:

Fukushima still
Leaks. Nearly three years later,
Oceans and air fill

With poisons. Unknown:
their full power, permanence,
possibility.

West Coast counters ping.
Measuring high, off the charts.
Radiation moves.

Do we still recall
Chernobyl and Rocky Flats?
Who will be a voice

For Three-Mile Island
Or Lucenz? Did we forget
Not so long ago

Destruction promised?
Mutually assured, we
Worked fevered, counting

Our efforts as so
Much patriotism. Safety
Was secondary.

Radiation lives
Up to its name, spreading out
In water and air.

In animals and
Dusting our salad leaves, we
Take every meal with

Delectable sides
Of plutonium, along
With other spices.

Mutual, assured
Destruction has become real.
Nuclear waste kills

Us before we can
Eliminate each other.
Still we don’t, won't quit.

Don’t act. Stay silent,
Confused. Would our government
Lie? Cover up? Say

Something is quite safe
When it is killing us, our
Children, theirs, and theirs?

What cost: energy?
Bomb stockpile must equal X.
When is it enough

Proliferation?
For any country? Person?
When does will it end?

This is my Father's
World. And my children's. Neighbors'
And my enemies'.

Will I pray with my
Feet, hands, voice, dollars, Spirit.
Even if it feels

Futile? Otherwise
Poison hisses over both
Apples and tuna.

Cleaning and clearing
Deserve our every effort
Since mutually

Assured blessings are
Certainly preferable
For all creation.

Fukushima still
Leaks. Nearly three years later,
Oceans and air fill

With poisons. Unknown:
their full power, permanence,
possibility.



Cross-posted at RevGalBlogPals for The Pastoral is Political.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I'm In

A few weeks ago ,  I was using voice-to-text to compose some prayers. After I was finished speaking the whole list, I was proof-reading the document and   realized that everywhere I said “Amen”, the voice-to-text wrote “I’m in”. “Amen” essentially means  “may it be so”,  but what would it look like to end our prayers with “I’m in”. What would change if we rose from our knees, left our prayer closets, closed our devotionals, and moved with purpose toward the goals for which we had just prayed.  Lord, in your mercy:  Grant justice to the oppressed and disenfranchised (I’m in) Cast down the mighty from their thrones (I’m in)  Console the grieving and welcome the prodigal (I’m in)  Welcome strangers and attend to the marginalized (I’m in)  Grant the space for the silenced to speak… and listen (I’m in)  Fill the hungry with good things and send the rich away empty (I’m in)  Forgive others as I am forgiven (I’m in) Be merciful as God in h...

The Reign of Christ and the Long Defeat

At one point in The Lord of the Rings, the royal elf Galadriel describes her life and experience and says, “… we have fought the long defeat.” Galadriel, like other elves and the Hobbits and many others, is depicted as being on the right side of things in the books. The Company of the Ring (the Fellowship) wins and defeats the forces of evil. Why would she consider this a “long defeat”?  Furthermore, why would J.R.R. Tolkien, the author, apply the same term to himself. He wrote in a letter, “Actually, I am a Christian, and indeed a Roman Catholic, so that I do not expect ‘history’ to be anything but a 'long defeat’ – though it contains (and in a legend may contain more clearly and movingly) some samples or glimpses of final victory.” (Letter #195) Tolkien, a Brit, fought in World War 1. Though he was on the side that “won”, he saw the devastation following the war on all sides- how the “winners” struggled with what they had seen and done and how the “losers” were galvanized to see ...

Top Ten Things to Learn from the book of Job

Readings: Job 1:1-22; Job 38:1-11; Luke 8: 22-25 10. Job contradicts Proverbs.   The writer of Proverbs offers the hope and consolation that people who live wisely and faithfully, according to the will of God, will flourish and prosper. The very first chapter of Job says: it ain’t necessarily so. You may well live righteously and with great integrity and, still, terrible things may happen. A faithful life is not an automatic buffer to calamity. Due to this contradiction between the books, both of which are categorized as wisdom literature, we are reminded of all those who have gone before us who tried to make the Bible speak with one voice. It doesn’t. The Bible has many voices, some of which are quite dissonant together, but they sing one song about the presence and providence of God.  9. Job is an old story, but a young book, relatively speaking. Since Job doesn’t mention Abraham or Moses or the laws or the Temple, some interpreters have considered it the oldest story ...